The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 6 of 15. E. OpenAI’s API and ChatGPT Today, there are two primary ways to interact with OpenAI’s models. The first is an application programming interface (“API”) that allows developers to prompt the models directly with computer code. Compl. ¶ 62. Developers must specify a number of parameters, including their desired “Model” version and “Temperature” (i.e., the degree of randomness). See, e.g., id. ¶ 140. Developers can supply a “System” prompt, which tells the model how to behave, e.g., “You are a thespian who speaks only in iambic pentameter.” Id. OpenAI also provides a “Playground” for developers to experiment with the models. See id. The second is ChatGPT, a consumer-friendly platform—accessible for free at chat.openai.com—to “chat” with an OpenAI model through a user interface.[24] Its “Browse with Bing” feature enables ChatGPT to fetch recent information about events that occurred after the models’ training “cutoff,” using the Bing search engine. Compl. ¶¶ 72, 108, 112. Using it is the equivalent of instructing a research assistant to use the Internet to look up a fact she does not yet know. The feature goes hand-in-hand with others that collectively amplify ChatGPT’s utility. See Bubeck Paper at 45 (describing ability to “coordinate a dinner” using “APIs to retrieve information about the user’s calendar, coordinate with other people over email, [and] book the dinner”). After its release in November 2022, ChatGPT became an “instant viral sensation.” Compl. ¶ 61. According to the Complaint, by April 2023, the service had 173 million users globally who rely on ChatGPT to “craft clearer communications, accelerate coding tasks, rapidly explore answers to complex business questions, assist with creative work, and much more.”[25] Continue Reading Here. [24] Compl. ¶¶ 62, 102; OpenAI Blog, Introducing ChatGPT Plus (Feb. 1, 2023), https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plus; see also Compl. ¶ 149 n.41 (citing this page). [25] Compl. ¶ 149; OpenAI Blog, Introducing ChatGPT Enterprise (Aug. 28, 2023), https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-enterprise; see also Compl. ¶¶ 63, 149 & nn.5 & 42 (citing this article); About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 6 of 15. The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 6 of 15. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here here E. OpenAI’s API and ChatGPT Today, there are two primary ways to interact with OpenAI’s models. The first is an application programming interface (“API”) that allows developers to prompt the models directly with computer code. Compl. ¶ 62. Developers must specify a number of parameters, including their desired “Model” version and “Temperature” (i.e., the degree of randomness). See, e.g., id. ¶ 140. Developers can supply a “System” prompt, which tells the model how to behave, e.g., “You are a thespian who speaks only in iambic pentameter.” Id. OpenAI also provides a “Playground” for developers to experiment with the models. See id. The second is ChatGPT, a consumer-friendly platform—accessible for free at chat.openai.com—to “chat” with an OpenAI model through a user interface.[24] Its “Browse with Bing” feature enables ChatGPT to fetch recent information about events that occurred after the models’ training “cutoff,” using the Bing search engine. Compl. ¶¶ 72, 108, 112. Using it is the equivalent of instructing a research assistant to use the Internet to look up a fact she does not yet know. The feature goes hand-in-hand with others that collectively amplify ChatGPT’s utility. See Bubeck Paper at 45 (describing ability to “coordinate a dinner” using “APIs to retrieve information about the user’s calendar, coordinate with other people over email, [and] book the dinner”). After its release in November 2022, ChatGPT became an “instant viral sensation.” Compl. ¶ 61. According to the Complaint, by April 2023, the service had 173 million users globally who rely on ChatGPT to “craft clearer communications, accelerate coding tasks, rapidly explore answers to complex business questions, assist with creative work, and much more.”[25] Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here [24] Compl. ¶¶ 62, 102; OpenAI Blog, Introducing ChatGPT Plus (Feb. 1, 2023), https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plus; see also Compl. ¶ 149 n.41 (citing this page). [25] Compl. ¶ 149; OpenAI Blog, Introducing ChatGPT Enterprise (Aug. 28, 2023), https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-enterprise; see also Compl. ¶¶ 63, 149 & nn.5 & 42 (citing this article); About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. fingfx.thomsonreuters.com

ChatGPT's Predecessor Was Trained on 'Filtered' Internet Data from an Open Source Repository

The New York Times Fails to Identify Copyright Infringement by ChatGPT

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

OpenAI Provides a “Playground” for Developers to Experiment With

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

Because It Cannot Sue ChatGPT For Mimicry, the NYT Lawsuit Focuses on AI Hallucination Instead

ChatGPT Never Produced "Wholesale Copies" of NYT's Articles

ChatGPT's Predecessor Could Translate French Even Though It Was Not Trained to Do So

ChatGPT's Predecessor Was Trained on 'Filtered' Internet Data from an Open Source Repository

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

Because It Cannot Sue ChatGPT For Mimicry, the NYT Lawsuit Focuses on AI Hallucination Instead

ChatGPT Never Produced "Wholesale Copies" of NYT's Articles

ChatGPT's Predecessor Could Translate French Even Though It Was Not Trained to Do So

ChatGPT's Predecessor Was Trained on 'Filtered' Internet Data from an Open Source Repository

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps