Table of Links
2. Contexts, Methods, and Tasks
3.1. Quality and 3.2 Productivity
5. Discussion and Future Work
5.1. LLM, Your pAIr Programmer?
5.2. LLM, A Better pAIr Programmer?
5.3. LLM, Students’ pAIr Programmer?
6. Conclusion, Acknowledgments, and References
4.1 Task Types & Complexity
For task type and task complexity, Chaparro et al. [16] found that debugging tasks lead to less satisfaction and perceived efficacy compared to comprehension and refactoring tasks. Hannay et al. [31] found that the duration is shorter for low complexity tasks, at the expense of lower quality results, and quality is higher when complexity is higher, but it requires considerably greater effort. Arisholm et al. [6] found that the moderating effect of complexity also depends on the expertise of the pair, where “benefits of correctness on complex system apply mainly to juniors, whereas the reductions in duration to perform the tasks correctly on the simple system apply mainly to intermediates and seniors.”
Authors:
(1) Qianou Ma (Corresponding author), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA ([email protected]);
(2) Tongshuang Wu, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA ([email protected]);
(3) Kenneth Koedinger, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA ([email protected]).
This paper is
