Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Experiment Definition 2. Experiment Definition 3. Experiment Design and Conduct 3. Experiment Design and Conduct 3.1 Latin Square Designs 3.1 Latin Square Designs 3.2 Subjects, Tasks and Objects 3.2 Subjects, Tasks and Objects 3.3 Conduct 3.3 Conduct 3.4 Measures 3.4 Measures 4. Data Analysis 4. Data Analysis 4.1 Model Assumptions 4.1 Model Assumptions 4.2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 4.2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 4.3 Treatment Comparisons 4.3 Treatment Comparisons 4.4 Effect Size and Power Analysis 4.4 Effect Size and Power Analysis 5. Experiment Limitations and 5.1 Threats to the Conclusion Validity 5. Experiment Limitations and 5.1 Threats to the Conclusion Validity 5.2 Threats to Internal Validity 5.2 Threats to Internal Validity 5.3 Threats to Construct Validity 5.3 Threats to Construct Validity 5.4 Threats to External Validity 5.4 Threats to External Validity 6. Discussion and 6.1 Duration 6. Discussion and 6.1 Duration 6.2 Effort 6.2 Effort 7. Conclusions and Further Work, and References 7. Conclusions and Further Work, and References 4. Data Analysis Once we have the measures, we are able to test the hypotheses through statistical inferences. The statistical model associated with a Latin square design is shown in equation (1). This design uses analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the components (overall mean, blocks, treatment and random error) of the model. ANOVA is based on looking at the total variability of the collected measures and the variability partition according to different components. ANOVA provides a statistical test of whether or not the means of several groups are all equal. The null hypothesis is that all groups are simply random samples of the same population. This implies that all treatments have the same effect (perhaps none). Rejecting the null hypothesis implies that different treatments result in altered effects. In this experiment, we have two groups of means (Pair and Solo programming), which are blocked by program and tool support. Authors:
(1) Omar S. Gómez, full time professor of Software Engineering at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY);
(2) José L. Batún, full time professor of Statistics at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY);
(3) Raúl A. Aguilar, Faculty of Mathematics, Autonomous University of Yucatan Merida, Yucatan 97119, Mexico. Authors: Authors: (1) Omar S. Gómez, full time professor of Software Engineering at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY); (2) José L. Batún, full time professor of Statistics at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY); (3) Raúl A. Aguilar, Faculty of Mathematics, Autonomous University of Yucatan Merida, Yucatan 97119, Mexico. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Understanding ANOVA for Pair Programming Experiments

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

11 Proven Solutions to Common GitHub Copilot Problems

Is Pair Programming Faster? An ANOVA Analysis

The Science Behind Pair Programming: A UADY Experiment

Experiment Design: A Guide to the Goal-Question-Metric Approach

Latin Square Design: A Guide to Its Use in Software Engineering Experiments

11 Proven Solutions to Common GitHub Copilot Problems

Is Pair Programming Faster? An ANOVA Analysis

The Science Behind Pair Programming: A UADY Experiment

Experiment Design: A Guide to the Goal-Question-Metric Approach

Latin Square Design: A Guide to Its Use in Software Engineering Experiments

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps