Authors:
(1) Limeng Zhang, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia;
(2) M. Ali Babar, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 1.1 Configuration Parameter Tuning Challenges and 1.2 Contributions 2 Tuning Objectives 3 Overview of Tuning Framework 4 Workload Characterization and 4.1 Query-level Characterization 4.2 Runtime-based Characterization 5 Feature Pruning and 5.1 Workload-level Pruning 5.2 Configuration-level Pruning 5.3 Summary 6 Knowledge from Experience 7 Configuration Recommendation and 7.1 Bayesian Optimization 7.2 Neural Network 7.3 Reinforcement Learning 7.4 Search-based Solutions 8 Experimental Setting 9 Related Work 10 Discussion and Conclusion, and References 9 RELATED WORK Recently, the authors in [84] provided an experimental evaluation of several BO-based solutions and RL-based solutions and demonstrated how hyper-parameter optimization algorithms can be borrowed to further enhance database configuration tuning. After that, the authors in [85] conducted a survey on the state-of-the-art DBMS tuning methods, including heuristic methods, Bayesian optimization methods, deep learning methods, and reinforcement learning methods. They illustrated the automatic tuning pipeline ranging from data preparation to configuration tuning. In this study, in addition to elucidating the automatic tuning framework on DBMSs, we provide an in-depth analysis of each component. Specifically, we outline the primary tuning objectives and summarize three main constraints or factors in automatic configuration tuning in DBMS: overhead, adaptivity, and safety. Regarding workload characterization, we present methods for modeling a workload in terms of queries and DBMS runtime metrics. In the feature pruning section, we offer insights into pruning strategies at both the workload and configuration levels. Concerning knowledge transfer, we consolidate existing techniques and present two directions for adopting this knowledge. In the subsequent configuration recommendation section, we provide an overview of existing methods and highlight the available design considerations for each category. Additionally, we include several relevant automatic tuning methods that focus on big data analytics frameworks, which face similar challenges in identifying the optimal configuration within the complex and interdependent configuration space. Finally, in the experiment setting, we summarize popular benchmarks for evaluating DBMS performance. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED. Authors: (1) Limeng Zhang, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia; (2) M. Ali Babar, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia. Authors: Authors: (1) Limeng Zhang, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia; (2) M. Ali Babar, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 1.1 Configuration Parameter Tuning Challenges and 1.2 Contributions 1.1 Configuration Parameter Tuning Challenges and 1.2 Contributions 2 Tuning Objectives 2 Tuning Objectives 3 Overview of Tuning Framework 3 Overview of Tuning Framework 4 Workload Characterization and 4.1 Query-level Characterization 4 Workload Characterization and 4.1 Query-level Characterization 4.2 Runtime-based Characterization 4.2 Runtime-based Characterization 5 Feature Pruning and 5.1 Workload-level Pruning 5 Feature Pruning and 5.1 Workload-level Pruning 5.2 Configuration-level Pruning 5.2 Configuration-level Pruning 5.3 Summary 5.3 Summary 6 Knowledge from Experience 6 Knowledge from Experience 7 Configuration Recommendation and 7.1 Bayesian Optimization 7 Configuration Recommendation and 7.1 Bayesian Optimization 7.2 Neural Network 7.2 Neural Network 7.3 Reinforcement Learning 7.3 Reinforcement Learning 7.4 Search-based Solutions 7.4 Search-based Solutions 8 Experimental Setting 8 Experimental Setting 9 Related Work 9 Related Work 10 Discussion and Conclusion, and References 10 Discussion and Conclusion, and References 9 RELATED WORK Recently, the authors in [84] provided an experimental evaluation of several BO-based solutions and RL-based solutions and demonstrated how hyper-parameter optimization algorithms can be borrowed to further enhance database configuration tuning. After that, the authors in [85] conducted a survey on the state-of-the-art DBMS tuning methods, including heuristic methods, Bayesian optimization methods, deep learning methods, and reinforcement learning methods. They illustrated the automatic tuning pipeline ranging from data preparation to configuration tuning. In this study, in addition to elucidating the automatic tuning framework on DBMSs, we provide an in-depth analysis of each component. Specifically, we outline the primary tuning objectives and summarize three main constraints or factors in automatic configuration tuning in DBMS: overhead, adaptivity, and safety. Regarding workload characterization, we present methods for modeling a workload in terms of queries and DBMS runtime metrics. In the feature pruning section, we offer insights into pruning strategies at both the workload and configuration levels. Concerning knowledge transfer, we consolidate existing techniques and present two directions for adopting this knowledge. In the subsequent configuration recommendation section, we provide an overview of existing methods and highlight the available design considerations for each category. Additionally, we include several relevant automatic tuning methods that focus on big data analytics frameworks, which face similar challenges in identifying the optimal configuration within the complex and interdependent configuration space. Finally, in the experiment setting, we summarize popular benchmarks for evaluating DBMS performance. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED. available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Smarter Systems, Less Hassle: Inside DBMS Auto-Tuning

Benchmarking Database Performance: Key OLTP and OLAP Tools for System Evaluation

Configuring Technology

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Learn the Best Methods for Tuning DBMS Configurations

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

The Future of Automated Security Testing

The Noonification: Feature Optimization for Price Prediction (11/26/2023)

10 Ways to Optimize Your Database

10 Essential Computer Skills for Data Mining

10 Most Evolving Big Data Technologies to Catch Up on in 2022

The Future of Automated Security Testing

The Noonification: Feature Optimization for Price Prediction (11/26/2023)

10 Ways to Optimize Your Database

10 Essential Computer Skills for Data Mining

10 Most Evolving Big Data Technologies to Catch Up on in 2022

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps