Periwinkle Entertainment, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company Court Filing retrieved [redacted] is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 2 of 12. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 14. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Disney pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 410.10 because Disney is domiciled in and doing business in the State of California. The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of this Court. 15. Venue is proper in this County pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 395(a) and 395.5 because Disney has its principal place of business in the County of Los Angeles. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved [redacted] deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Periwinkle Entertainment, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company Court Filing retrieved [redacted] is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 2 of 12. Periwinkle Entertainment, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company Court Filing retrieved [redacted] is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 2 of 12. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 14. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Disney pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 410.10 because Disney is domiciled in and doing business in the State of California. The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of this Court. 15. Venue is proper in this County pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 395(a) and 395.5 because Disney has its principal place of business in the County of Los Angeles. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved [redacted] deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved [redacted] deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. deadline.com

Ever Wonder Why Scarlett Johansson Chose Los Angeles to Sue Disney?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

DOE v. Github: Code Stored on GitHub Ultimately Belong to Their Authors

The Noonification: Dear America, I Am Breaking Up With You (6/2/2024)

The Noonification: Dear America, I Am Breaking Up With You (5/26/2024)

The Noonification: How AI’s Bias Problem Can Affect Your Next Job Application (5/22/2024)

Scarlett Johansson vs Disney: Demand for Jury Trial

Scarlett Johansson vs Disney: Prayer for Relief

DOE v. Github: Code Stored on GitHub Ultimately Belong to Their Authors

The Noonification: Dear America, I Am Breaking Up With You (6/2/2024)

The Noonification: Dear America, I Am Breaking Up With You (5/26/2024)

The Noonification: How AI’s Bias Problem Can Affect Your Next Job Application (5/22/2024)

Scarlett Johansson vs Disney: Demand for Jury Trial

Scarlett Johansson vs Disney: Prayer for Relief

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps