FTC v. Amazon: Consumers are not the winners of Amazon monopoly, per Plaintiff

CONSUMER INJURY

Consumers are suffering, have suffered, and will continue to suffer substantial injury as a result of Defendant’s violations of the FTC Act and ROSCA. Absent injunctive relief by this Court, Defendant is likely to continue to injure consumers and harm the public interest.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore, Plaintiff requests that the Court:

A. Enter a permanent injunction to prevent future violations of the FTC Act and ROSCA by Defendant;

B. Award Plaintiff monetary civil penalties from Defendant for every violation of ROSCA;

C. Award monetary and other relief within the Court’s power to grant; and

D. Award any additional relief as the Court determines to be just and proper.

Dated: June 21, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Evan Mendelson

EVAN MENDELSON (DC Bar #996765)

By: /s/ Jonathan Cohen

JONATHAN COHEN (DC Bar #483454)

By: /s/ Olivia Jerjian

OLIVIA JERJIAN (DC Bar #1034299)

By: /s/ Thomas Maxwell Nardini

THOMAS MAXWELL NARDINI (IL Bar # 6330190)

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580

(202) 326-3320; [email protected] (Mendelson)

(202) 326-2551; [email protected] (Cohen)

(202) 326-2749; [email protected] (Jerjian)

(202) 326-2812; [email protected] (Nardini)

By: /s/ Colin D. A. MacDonald

Colin D. A. MacDonald (WSBA # 55243)

Federal Trade Commission

915 Second Ave., Suite 2896

Seattle, WA 98174

(206) 220-4474; [email protected] (MacDonald)

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION