Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 2. Related Work 3. Method and 3.1. Architecture 3.2. Loss and 3.3. Implementation Details 4. Data Curation 4.1. Training Dataset 4.2. Evaluation Benchmark 5. Experiments and 5.1. Metrics 5.2. Baselines 5.3. Comparison to SOTA Methods 5.4. Qualitative Results and 5.5. Ablation Study 6. Limitations and Discussion 7. Conclusion and References A. Additional Qualitative Comparison B. Inference on AI-generated Images C. Data Curation Details 4.2. Evaluation Benchmark We use three different real-world dataset evaluation: OmniObject3D [66], Ocrtoc3D [51], and Pix3D [52]. Because our testing images images come from the real world, or are renders of real 3D object scans distinct from our training set, they are a good test set for zero-shot generalization. OmniObject3D. OmniObject3D is a large and diverse dataset of 3D scans and videos of objects from 216 categories, including household objects and products, food and toys. Because the foreground segmentations are noisy, we follow convention and render the 3D scans to generate test images [30, 31]. We improve the default material shader which generates glass-like surface appearance to appear more natural. We use Blender and HDR environment maps to generate realistic images with diverse lighting. We randomly sample camera viewpoint, distance and focal length. Ocrtoc3D. Ocrtoc3D is a real-world object dataset that contains object-centric videos and full 3D annotations from 15 coarse categories. Some coarse categories contain many subcategories (e.g. toy animals contain various species). For each video the mesh (3D scan) and the viewpoint information are provided. We clean up this dataset by manually removing outliers (e.g. empty meshes/wrong object scales) and use the full filtered dataset consisting of 749 unique image-object pairs. Pix3D. Pix3D is a real-world object dataset that contains 3D annotations from 9 categories. For each image in this dataset, an object mask, a CAD model, and the input viewpoint information are provided. These 3D annotations come from manual alignment between shapes and images. We follow the split of [19] and use 1181 images. Benchmark curation. To create an easy-to-use benchmark, we convert the three heterogeneous datasets into a unified format. This includes aligning and converting the camera intrinsics and extrinsics, and object poses, to a standardized convention across the test datasets and our synthetic dataset. This is often a tedious obstacle in 3D vision research. We also organize images, masks and other metadata in a standardized manner. The release of our training data, data gen erating pipeline, and benchmark will benefit the community by providing a unified setup for large scale training on synthetic data and large scale testing on real data. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. Authors:
(1) Zixuan Huang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and both authors contributed equally to this work;
(2) Stefan Stojanov, Georgia Institute of Technology and both authors contributed equally to this work;
(3) Anh Thai, Georgia Institute of Technology;
(4) Varun Jampani, Stability AI;
(5) James M. Rehg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2. Related Work 2. Related Work 3. Method and 3.1. Architecture 3. Method and 3.1. Architecture 3.2. Loss and 3.3. Implementation Details 3.2. Loss and 3.3. Implementation Details 4. Data Curation 4.1. Training Dataset 4.1. Training Dataset 4.2. Evaluation Benchmark 4.2. Evaluation Benchmark 5. Experiments and 5.1. Metrics 5. Experiments and 5.1. Metrics 5.2. Baselines 5.2. Baselines 5.3. Comparison to SOTA Methods 5.3. Comparison to SOTA Methods 5.4. Qualitative Results and 5.5. Ablation Study 5.4. Qualitative Results and 5.5. Ablation Study 6. Limitations and Discussion 6. Limitations and Discussion 7. Conclusion and References 7. Conclusion and References A. Additional Qualitative Comparison A. Additional Qualitative Comparison B. Inference on AI-generated Images B. Inference on AI-generated Images C. Data Curation Details C. Data Curation Details 4.2. Evaluation Benchmark We use three different real-world dataset evaluation: OmniObject3D [66], Ocrtoc3D [51], and Pix3D [52]. Because our testing images images come from the real world, or are renders of real 3D object scans distinct from our training set, they are a good test set for zero-shot generalization. OmniObject3D. OmniObject3D is a large and diverse dataset of 3D scans and videos of objects from 216 categories, including household objects and products, food and toys. Because the foreground segmentations are noisy, we follow convention and render the 3D scans to generate test images [30, 31]. We improve the default material shader which generates glass-like surface appearance to appear more natural. We use Blender and HDR environment maps to generate realistic images with diverse lighting. We randomly sample camera viewpoint, distance and focal length. OmniObject3D. Ocrtoc3D. Ocrtoc3D is a real-world object dataset that contains object-centric videos and full 3D annotations from 15 coarse categories. Some coarse categories contain many subcategories (e.g. toy animals contain various species). For each video the mesh (3D scan) and the viewpoint information are provided. We clean up this dataset by manually removing outliers (e.g. empty meshes/wrong object scales) and use the full filtered dataset consisting of 749 unique image-object pairs. Ocrtoc3D. Pix3D . Pix3D is a real-world object dataset that contains 3D annotations from 9 categories. For each image in this dataset, an object mask, a CAD model, and the input viewpoint information are provided. These 3D annotations come from manual alignment between shapes and images. We follow the split of [19] and use 1181 images. Pix3D Benchmark curation. To create an easy-to-use benchmark, we convert the three heterogeneous datasets into a unified format. This includes aligning and converting the camera intrinsics and extrinsics, and object poses, to a standardized convention across the test datasets and our synthetic dataset. This is often a tedious obstacle in 3D vision research. We also organize images, masks and other metadata in a standardized manner. The release of our training data, data gen Benchmark curation. erating pipeline, and benchmark will benefit the community by providing a unified setup for large scale training on synthetic data and large scale testing on real data. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv Authors: (1) Zixuan Huang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and both authors contributed equally to this work; (2) Stefan Stojanov, Georgia Institute of Technology and both authors contributed equally to this work; (3) Anh Thai, Georgia Institute of Technology; (4) Varun Jampani, Stability AI; (5) James M. Rehg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Authors: Authors: (1) Zixuan Huang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and both authors contributed equally to this work; (2) Stefan Stojanov, Georgia Institute of Technology and both authors contributed equally to this work; (3) Anh Thai, Georgia Institute of Technology; (4) Varun Jampani, Stability AI; (5) James M. Rehg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

ZeroShape: The Training Dataset That We Used

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

A Close Look at Misalignment in Pretraining Datasets

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

100 Days of AI, Day 8: Experimenting With Microsoft's Semantic Kernel Using GPT-4

A Close Look at Misalignment in Pretraining Datasets

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

100 Days of AI, Day 8: Experimenting With Microsoft's Semantic Kernel Using GPT-4

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps