Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Background & Problem Statement 2.1 How can we use MLLMs for Diffusion Synthesis that Synergizes both sides? 3 DreamLLM 3.1 End-to-End Interleaved generative Pretraining (I-GPT) 3.2 Model Training 4 Experiments and 4.1 Multimodal Comprehension 4.2 Text-Conditional Image Synthesis 4.3 Multimodal Joint Creation & Comprehension 5 Discussions 5.1 Synergy between creation & Comprehension? 5. 2 What is learned by DreamLLM? 6 Related Works 7 Conclusions and References A Additional Experiments B Additional Qualitative Examples C Implementation Details D Additional Related Works E Limitations, Failure Cases & Future Works A ADDITIONAL EXPERIMENTS A.1 ADDITIONAL NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING RESULTS We evaluate the natural language processing capabilities of DREAMLLM post-multimodal adaptation learning via zero-shot experiments on language-only tasks. These included commonsense reasoning (PIQA (Bisk et al., 2020), SIQA (Sap et al., 2019), HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), WinoGrande (Sakaguchi et al., 2021)), reading comprehension (BoolQ (Clark et al., 2019)), and a general multi-task benchmark (MMLU 5-shot (Hendrycks et al., 2021)). As Table 4 illustrates, DREAMLLM outperforms the Vicuna baseline on most language benchmarks. This suggests that DREAMLLM’s multimodal adaptation does not compromise the language learning model’s (LLM) capabilities. When compared to prior Multimodal Language Learning Models (MLLMs), DREAMLLM demonstrates superior performance, although this may be attributed to the higher baseline results. This finding suggests that a more robust LLM base model could yield improved results. A.2 ADDITIONAL MULTIMODAL COMPREHENSION RESULTS Detailed Comprehensive Comparison The evaluation results on MMBench (Liu et al., 2023c) and MM-Vet (Yu et al., 2023b) are presented in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. The key observations from these results are as follows: i) Our DREAMLLM-7B outperforms all other 7B MLLMs, setting a new benchmark in overall performance. Notably, it even exceeds the performance of some 13B models, including LLaVA and MiniGPT-4. ii) A detailed capability evaluation reveals DREAMLLM’s superior performance in fine-grained understanding and relational/spatial comprehension. This advantage is likely due to DREAMLLM’s unique learning synergy, where image distributions are comprehended not solely through language-posterior comprehension, but also through creation. Visual Hallucination Visual hallucination, a phenomenon where Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) generate non-existent objects or identities in images, significantly compromises their multimodal comprehension capabilities and may pose safety risks (MacLeod et al., 2017; Rohrbach et al., 2018). We assess the robustness of DREAMLLM against visual hallucination using the recently developed POPE benchmark (Li et al., 2023d). Refer to Table 7 for a detailed comparison with concurrent comprehension-only MLLMs. Our results indicate that DREAMLLM-7B exhibits robustness to visual hallucination, matching or surpassing the performance of 13B counterparts. Remarkably, DREAMLLM achieves most best or second-best performance in the most challenging setting. We posit that this robust anti-hallucination property stems from a deep understanding of object concepts and semantics, fostered by multimodal creation learning. A.3 ADDITIONAL ABLATION STUDY Query Number In Table 8a, we show the results of DREAMLLM using different numbers of the proposed learnable queries. i.e., queries. The results show that 64 queries achieve the best result, while 128 may be too many that may impact the performance. However, the choice of query number is also related to the training data size and diffusion model choice. For example, if given more data and a stronger diffusion model image decoder, queries more than 64 may be better. A.4 INFERENCE LATENCY In Table 8b, we present a comparison of real-time inference latency between DREAMLLM and SD. Relative to SD, DREAMLLM introduces a marginal latency cost of 0.2s on average. This is because the latency primarily stems from the computational demands of the diffusion U-Net denoising, rather than the text condition embedding. To enhance inference efficiency, potential strategies could include the adoption of Consistency Models (Song et al., 2023), or the implementation of model compression techniques such as quantization (Yao et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2022; Shang et al., 2023). This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. Authors:
(1) Runpei Dong, Xi’an Jiaotong University and Internship at MEGVII;
(2) Chunrui Han, MEGVII Technology;
(3) Yuang Peng, Tsinghua University and Internship at MEGVII;
(4) Zekun Qi, Xi’an Jiaotong University and Internship at MEGVII;
(5) Zheng Ge, MEGVII Technology;
(6) Jinrong Yang, HUST and Internship at MEGVII;
(7) Liang Zhao, MEGVII Technology;
(8) Jianjian Sun, MEGVII Technology;
(9) Hongyu Zhou, MEGVII Technology;
(10) Haoran Wei, MEGVII Technology;
(11) Xiangwen Kong, MEGVII Technology;
(12) Xiangyu Zhang, MEGVII Technology and a Project leader;
(13) Kaisheng Ma, Tsinghua University and a Corresponding author;
(14) Li Yi, Tsinghua University, a Corresponding authors and Project leader. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Background & Problem Statement 2 Background & Problem Statement 2.1 How can we use MLLMs for Diffusion Synthesis that Synergizes both sides? 2.1 How can we use MLLMs for Diffusion Synthesis that Synergizes both sides? 3 DreamLLM 3 DreamLLM 3.1 End-to-End Interleaved generative Pretraining (I-GPT) 3.1 End-to-End Interleaved generative Pretraining (I-GPT) 3.2 Model Training 3.2 Model Training 4 Experiments and 4.1 Multimodal Comprehension 4 Experiments and 4.1 Multimodal Comprehension 4.2 Text-Conditional Image Synthesis 4.2 Text-Conditional Image Synthesis 4.3 Multimodal Joint Creation & Comprehension 4.3 Multimodal Joint Creation & Comprehension 5 Discussions 5.1 Synergy between creation & Comprehension? 5.1 Synergy between creation & Comprehension? 5. 2 What is learned by DreamLLM? 5. 2 What is learned by DreamLLM? 6 Related Works 6 Related Works 7 Conclusions and References 7 Conclusions and References A Additional Experiments A Additional Experiments B Additional Qualitative Examples B Additional Qualitative Examples C Implementation Details C Implementation Details D Additional Related Works D Additional Related Works E Limitations, Failure Cases & Future Works E Limitations, Failure Cases & Future Works A ADDITIONAL EXPERIMENTS A.1 ADDITIONAL NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING RESULTS We evaluate the natural language processing capabilities of DREAMLLM post-multimodal adaptation learning via zero-shot experiments on language-only tasks. These included commonsense reasoning (PIQA (Bisk et al., 2020), SIQA (Sap et al., 2019), HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), WinoGrande (Sakaguchi et al., 2021)), reading comprehension (BoolQ (Clark et al., 2019)), and a general multi-task benchmark (MMLU 5-shot (Hendrycks et al., 2021)). As Table 4 illustrates, DREAMLLM outperforms the Vicuna baseline on most language benchmarks. This suggests that DREAMLLM’s multimodal adaptation does not compromise the language learning model’s (LLM) capabilities. When compared to prior Multimodal Language Learning Models (MLLMs), DREAMLLM demonstrates superior performance, although this may be attributed to the higher baseline results. This finding suggests that a more robust LLM base model could yield improved results. A.2 ADDITIONAL MULTIMODAL COMPREHENSION RESULTS Detailed Comprehensive Comparison The evaluation results on MMBench (Liu et al., 2023c) and MM-Vet (Yu et al., 2023b) are presented in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. Detailed Comprehensive Comparison The key observations from these results are as follows: i) Our DREAMLLM-7B outperforms all other 7B MLLMs, setting a new benchmark in overall performance. Notably, it even exceeds the performance of some 13B models, including LLaVA and MiniGPT-4. ii) A detailed capability evaluation reveals DREAMLLM’s superior performance in fine-grained understanding and relational/spatial comprehension. This advantage is likely due to DREAMLLM’s unique learning synergy, where image distributions are comprehended not solely through language-posterior comprehension, but also through creation. Visual Hallucination Visual hallucination, a phenomenon where Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) generate non-existent objects or identities in images, significantly compromises their multimodal comprehension capabilities and may pose safety risks (MacLeod et al., 2017; Rohrbach et al., 2018). We assess the robustness of DREAMLLM against visual hallucination using the recently developed POPE benchmark (Li et al., 2023d). Visual Hallucination Refer to Table 7 for a detailed comparison with concurrent comprehension-only MLLMs. Our results indicate that DREAMLLM-7B exhibits robustness to visual hallucination, matching or surpassing the performance of 13B counterparts. Remarkably, DREAMLLM achieves most best or second-best performance in the most challenging setting. We posit that this robust anti-hallucination property stems from a deep understanding of object concepts and semantics, fostered by multimodal creation learning. A.3 ADDITIONAL ABLATION STUDY Query Number In Table 8a, we show the results of DREAMLLM using different numbers of the proposed learnable queries. i.e., queries. The results show that 64 queries achieve the best result, while 128 may be too many that may impact the performance. However, the choice of query number is also related to the training data size and diffusion model choice. For example, if given more data and a stronger diffusion model image decoder, queries more than 64 may be better. Query Number A.4 INFERENCE LATENCY In Table 8b, we present a comparison of real-time inference latency between DREAMLLM and SD. Relative to SD, DREAMLLM introduces a marginal latency cost of 0.2s on average. This is because the latency primarily stems from the computational demands of the diffusion U-Net denoising, rather than the text condition embedding. To enhance inference efficiency, potential strategies could include the adoption of Consistency Models (Song et al., 2023), or the implementation of model compression techniques such as quantization (Yao et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2022; Shang et al., 2023). This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv Authors: (1) Runpei Dong, Xi’an Jiaotong University and Internship at MEGVII; (2) Chunrui Han, MEGVII Technology; (3) Yuang Peng, Tsinghua University and Internship at MEGVII; (4) Zekun Qi, Xi’an Jiaotong University and Internship at MEGVII; (5) Zheng Ge, MEGVII Technology; (6) Jinrong Yang, HUST and Internship at MEGVII; (7) Liang Zhao, MEGVII Technology; (8) Jianjian Sun, MEGVII Technology; (9) Hongyu Zhou, MEGVII Technology; (10) Haoran Wei, MEGVII Technology; (11) Xiangwen Kong, MEGVII Technology; (12) Xiangyu Zhang, MEGVII Technology and a Project leader; (13) Kaisheng Ma, Tsinghua University and a Corresponding author; (14) Li Yi, Tsinghua University, a Corresponding authors and Project leader. Authors: Authors: (1) Runpei Dong, Xi’an Jiaotong University and Internship at MEGVII; (2) Chunrui Han, MEGVII Technology; (3) Yuang Peng, Tsinghua University and Internship at MEGVII; (4) Zekun Qi, Xi’an Jiaotong University and Internship at MEGVII; (5) Zheng Ge, MEGVII Technology; (6) Jinrong Yang, HUST and Internship at MEGVII; (7) Liang Zhao, MEGVII Technology; (8) Jianjian Sun, MEGVII Technology; (9) Hongyu Zhou, MEGVII Technology; (10) Haoran Wei, MEGVII Technology; (11) Xiangwen Kong, MEGVII Technology; (12) Xiangyu Zhang, MEGVII Technology and a Project leader; (13) Kaisheng Ma, Tsinghua University and a Corresponding author; (14) Li Yi, Tsinghua University, a Corresponding authors and Project leader.

DreamLLM: Additional Qualitative Examples That Show Off Its Power

DreamLLM: What We Can Conclude From This Comprehensive Framework?

AI Models on HackerNoon

Too Long; Didn't Read

Get Free Unlimited IP Geo Data With IPinfo Lite

DreamLLM: Additional Experiments That Shed New Light

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

102 Languages, One Model: The Multimodal AI Breakthrough You Need to Know

Unlocking Synergy: Advancements in Training Multimodal Language Models for Vision and Text

What Is DreamLLM? Everything You Need to Know About the Learning Framework

Get to Know More About DreamLLM: The Background on This Learning Framework

Using MLLMs for Diffusion Synthesis That Synergizes Both Sides: How Is This Possible?

How DreamLLM Generates an Image On Its Own "Free Will"

102 Languages, One Model: The Multimodal AI Breakthrough You Need to Know

Unlocking Synergy: Advancements in Training Multimodal Language Models for Vision and Text

What Is DreamLLM? Everything You Need to Know About the Learning Framework

Get to Know More About DreamLLM: The Background on This Learning Framework

Using MLLMs for Diffusion Synthesis That Synergizes Both Sides: How Is This Possible?

How DreamLLM Generates an Image On Its Own "Free Will"

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps