This story draft by @hyperbole has not been reviewed by an editor, YET.
Proposed Approach
C. Formulation of MLR from the Perspective of Distances to Hyperplanes
H. Computation of Canonical Representation
Proof. We first recall the definition of the binary operation ⊕g in Nguyen (2022b).
Proof. The first part of Proposition 3.4 can be easily verified using the definition of the SPD inner product (see Definition G.4) and that of Affine-Invariant metrics (Pennec et al., 2020) (see Chapter 3).
To prove the second part of Proposition 3.4, we will use the notion of SPD pseudogyrodistance (Nguyen & Yang, 2023) in our interpretation of FC layers on SPD manifolds, i.e., the signed distance is replaced with the signed SPD pseudo-gyrodistance in the interpretation given in Section 3.2.1. First, we need the following result from Nguyen & Yang (2023).
We consider two cases:
Proof. This proposition is a direct consequence of Proposition 3.4 for β = 0.
Proof. The first part of Proposition 3.6 can be easily verified using the definition of the SPD inner product (see Definition G.4) and that of Log-Cholesky metrics (Lin, 2019).
To prove the second part of Proposition 3.6, we first recall the following result from Nguyen & Yang (2023
According to our interpretation of FC layers,
We consider two cases
Proof. We need the following result from Nguyen & Yang (2023).
Authors:
(1) Xuan Son Nguyen, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France ([email protected]);
(2) Shuo Yang, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France ([email protected]);
(3) Aymeric Histace, ETIS, UMR 8051, CY Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, France ([email protected]).
This paper is