paint-brush
How Error Coefficients Reflect Stochastic Equilibrium Expansions in Inflation Modelsby@keynesian

How Error Coefficients Reflect Stochastic Equilibrium Expansions in Inflation Models

by Keynesian TechnologyDecember 8th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This section explores the derivation of error coefficients in the log-linearized Phillips curve, focusing on their dependence on present and past shocks in stochastic equilibrium. Key steps include expanding weighting terms, solving for canonical expansions, and deriving limiting solutions. While the full algorithm for numerical approximation lies outside this scope, the expressions illuminate critical macroeconomic dynamics under small noise and positive trend inflation assumptions.
featured image - How Error Coefficients Reflect Stochastic Equilibrium Expansions in Inflation Models
Keynesian Technology HackerNoon profile picture

Author:

(1) David Staines.

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Mathematical Arguments

3 Outline and Preview

4 Calvo Framework and 4.1 Household’s Problem

4.2 Preferences

4.3 Household Equilibrium Conditions

4.4 Price-Setting Problem

4.5 Nominal Equilibrium Conditions

4.6 Real Equilibrium Conditions and 4.7 Shocks

4.8 Recursive Equilibrium

5 Existing Solutions

5.1 Singular Phillips Curve

5.2 Persistence and Policy Puzzles

5.3 Two Comparison Models

5.4 Lucas Critique

6 Stochastic Equilibrium and 6.1 Ergodic Theory and Random Dynamical Systems

6.2 Equilibrium Construction

6.3 Literature Comparison

6.4 Equilibrium Analysis

7 General Linearized Phillips Curve

7.1 Slope Coefficients

7.2 Error Coefficients

8 Existence Results and 8.1 Main Results

8.2 Key Proofs

8.3 Discussion

9 Bifurcation Analysis

9.1 Analytic Aspects

9.2 Algebraic Aspects (I) Singularities and Covers

9.3 Algebraic Aspects (II) Homology

9.4 Algebraic Aspects (III) Schemes

9.5 Wider Economic Interpretations

10 Econometric and Theoretical Implications and 10.1 Identification and Trade-offs

10.2 Econometric Duality

10.3 Coefficient Properties

10.4 Microeconomic Interpretation

11 Policy Rule

12 Conclusions and References


Appendices

A Proof of Theorem 2 and A.1 Proof of Part (i)

A.2 Behaviour of ∆

A.3 Proof Part (iii)

B Proofs from Section 4 and B.1 Individual Product Demand (4.2)

B.2 Flexible Price Equilibrium and ZINSS (4.4)

B.3 Price Dispersion (4.5)

B.4 Cost Minimization (4.6) and (10.4)

B.5 Consolidation (4.8)

C Proofs from Section 5, and C.1 Puzzles, Policy and Persistence

C.2 Extending No Persistence

D Stochastic Equilibrium and D.1 Non-Stochastic Equilibrium

D.2 Profits and Long-Run Growth

E Slopes and Eigenvalues and E.1 Slope Coefficients

E.2 Linearized DSGE Solution

E.3 Eigenvalue Conditions

E.4 Rouche’s Theorem Conditions

F Abstract Algebra and F.1 Homology Groups

F.2 Basic Categories

F.3 De Rham Cohomology

F.4 Marginal Costs and Inflation

G Further Keynesian Models and G.1 Taylor Pricing

G.2 Calvo Wage Phillips Curve

G.3 Unconventional Policy Settings

H Empirical Robustness and H.1 Parameter Selection

H.2 Phillips Curve

I Additional Evidence and I.1 Other Structural Parameters

I.2 Lucas Critique

I.3 Trend Inflation Volatility

7.2 Error Coefficients

7.2.1 Coefficient Expressions

The starting point is the infinite horizon solutions, which states how present deviations depend on present and past shocks.



For the expectation variables it implies



The first two steps remove expectations to focus on future variables. The third treats lag terms. The fourth is consolidation, the fifth deals with the Euler and the sixth puts them all together. Proceeding through the derivation in order, it is clear that



The coefficients have been organised so that the bracketed terms will be positive when computed in the small noise limit at strictly positive rates of trend inflation, as this is a focal alternative to ZINSS.[57] To dig down to primitives it is necessary to expand out the weighting term as follows:



Expanding forward using (139), (140) and the primitive properties of the errors yields



Thus, I can substitute back into (146) to solve for the third error in terms of the canonical expansions. The unwieldy expression is suppressed. An algorithm for a solution, in terms of the stochastic equilibrium expansion coefficients, would be useful, alongside a method of numerical approximation. However, these tasks lie beyond the boundaries of this investigation.


The rest of the derivation is quite simple



Combining (139), (140), (149)-(151) gives the following cumbersome expression for the Phillips curve errors



All subsequent error forms can be derived easily from this point.

7.2.2 Limiting Solution


Now denoting the errors in (117) in the style of the slope coefficients



Hence, I am able to solve for the error coefficient using the output term in (112), the error expression (150) and the symmetry implied by (151) and (152)



This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.