This story draft by @legalpdf has not been reviewed by an editor, YET.
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation Court Filing December 27, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 20 of 27.
169. The Times incorporates by reference and realleges the preceding allegations as though fully set forth herein.
170. Microsoft controlled, directed, and profited from the infringement perpetrated by the OpenAI Defendants. Microsoft controls and directs the supercomputing platform used to store, process, and reproduce the training datasets containing millions of Times Works, the GPT models, and OpenAI’s ChatGPT offerings. Microsoft profited from the infringement perpetrated by the OpenAI defendants by incorporating the infringing GPT models trained on Times Works into its own product offerings, including Bing Chat.
171. Defendants OpenAI Inc., OpenAI GP, OAI Corporation LLC, OpenAI Holdings LLC, and Microsoft controlled, directed, and profited from the infringement perpetrated by Defendants OpenAI LP, OpenAI Global LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC, and OpenAI, LLC, including the reproduction and distribution of Times Works.
172. Defendants OpenAI Global LLC and OpenAI LP directed, controlled, and profited from the infringement perpetrated by Defendants OpenAI OpCo LLC and OpenAI, LLC, including the reproduction and distribution of Times Works.
173. Defendants OpenAI Inc., OpenAI LP, OAI Corporation LLC, OpenAI Holdings LLC, OpenAI Global LLC, and Microsoft are vicariously liable for copyright infringement.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 1:23-cv-11195 retrieved on December 29, 2023, from nycto-assets.nytimes.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.