This story draft by @legalpdf has not been reviewed by an editor, YET.
USA v. Samuel Bankman-Fried - Part 29: Restitution Forfeiture
USA v. Samuel Bankman-Fried Court Filing, retrieved on March 15, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 29 of 33.
RESTITUTION AND FORFEITURE
The Government has already seized over a billion dollars in assets. At sentencing, the Court should impose a money judgment of $11,020,000,000, along with forfeiting the defendant’s interest in the specific property listed in the preliminary order of forfeiture submitted as an exhibit to this memorandum. Such a money judgment represents the appropriate measure for forfeiture, under the facts and under the law; indeed it is a particularly conservative sum. For most of the specific property listed in the preliminary order of forfeiture, the defendant does not object to forfeiture of his interests; for the other property, the evidence at trial, and if need be at a hearing, amply supports its forfeitability.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on March 15, 2024, from storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
. . . comments & more!
