Amazon's Unfair Trade Practices in the State of Nevada

COUNT XI: VIOLATIONS OF THE NEVADA UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT

494. Plaintiff State of Nevada repeats and re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every preceding paragraph and allegation of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.

495. As repeatedly alleged supra, Amazon’s monopolistic and anticompetitive conduct produced, and continues to produce, harm to businesses and consumers across the Plaintiff States, including in Nevada. Accordingly, the aforementioned acts and practices by Amazon were, and continue to be, prohibited acts under the Nevada Unfair Trade Practices Act, as provided in Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.060.

496. To remedy Amazon’s violations of the Nevada Unfair Trade Practices Act, Plaintiff State of Nevada seeks the following relief:

(a) Injunctive relief to permanently prevent and restrain Amazon’s monopolistic and anticompetitive conduct, pursuant Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.070(c)(1);

(b) Equitable relief, and specifically disgorgement, pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.070(c)(4); and

(c) Any other equitable relief the Court considers appropriate and has the discretion to award pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.090(4).