paint-brush
The Judgement of the Court of Appeals Is Reversed in the Uber Lawsuitby@legalpdf
261 reads

The Judgement of the Court of Appeals Is Reversed in the Uber Lawsuit

by Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

@legalpdf

Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too...

February 3rd, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We limited our review to the question of PAGA standing and express no view on the parties’ arguments regarding the proper interpretation of the arbitration agreement.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail

@legalpdf

featured image - The Judgement of the Court of Appeals Is Reversed in the Uber Lawsuit
1x
Read by Dr. One voice-avatar

Listen to this story

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

@legalpdf

Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.

About @legalpdf
LEARN MORE ABOUT @LEGALPDF'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.

ERIK ADOLPH vs. Uber Court Filing, retrieved on July 17, 2023, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 15 of 15.

CONCLUSION

We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We limited our review to the question of PAGA standing and express no view on the parties’ arguments regarding the proper interpretation of the arbitration agreement.


LIU, J.


We Concur:


GUERRERO, C. J.

CORRIGAN, J.

KRUGER, J.

GROBAN, J.

JENKINS, J.

EVANS, J




About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case S274671 retrieved on September 22, 2023, from courts.ca.gov is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases@legalpdf
Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
Buaq
Unsafe
Sincos

Mentioned in this story

profiles