paint-brush
How Monopolistic Competition Shapes Product Demandby@keynesian

How Monopolistic Competition Shapes Product Demand

by Keynesian Technology
Keynesian Technology HackerNoon profile picture

Keynesian Technology

@keynesian

We research, report, & publish about the impact of Keynesian...

December 9th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This section proves the standard derivation of product demand under monopolistic competition, integrating utility maximization and expenditure constraints, based on the Armington and Dixit-Stiglitz frameworks.
featured image - How Monopolistic Competition Shapes Product Demand
1x
Read by Dr. One voice-avatar

Listen to this story

Keynesian Technology HackerNoon profile picture
Keynesian Technology

Keynesian Technology

@keynesian

We research, report, & publish about the impact of Keynesian Economics on the technology industry & digital products.

About @keynesian
LEARN MORE ABOUT @KEYNESIAN'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.
0-item

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Academic Research Paper

Academic Research Paper

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Author:

(1) David Staines.

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Mathematical Arguments

3 Outline and Preview

4 Calvo Framework and 4.1 Household’s Problem

4.2 Preferences

4.3 Household Equilibrium Conditions

4.4 Price-Setting Problem

4.5 Nominal Equilibrium Conditions

4.6 Real Equilibrium Conditions and 4.7 Shocks

4.8 Recursive Equilibrium

5 Existing Solutions

5.1 Singular Phillips Curve

5.2 Persistence and Policy Puzzles

5.3 Two Comparison Models

5.4 Lucas Critique

6 Stochastic Equilibrium and 6.1 Ergodic Theory and Random Dynamical Systems

6.2 Equilibrium Construction

6.3 Literature Comparison

6.4 Equilibrium Analysis

7 General Linearized Phillips Curve

7.1 Slope Coefficients

7.2 Error Coefficients

8 Existence Results and 8.1 Main Results

8.2 Key Proofs

8.3 Discussion

9 Bifurcation Analysis

9.1 Analytic Aspects

9.2 Algebraic Aspects (I) Singularities and Covers

9.3 Algebraic Aspects (II) Homology

9.4 Algebraic Aspects (III) Schemes

9.5 Wider Economic Interpretations

10 Econometric and Theoretical Implications and 10.1 Identification and Trade-offs

10.2 Econometric Duality

10.3 Coefficient Properties

10.4 Microeconomic Interpretation

11 Policy Rule

12 Conclusions and References


Appendices

A Proof of Theorem 2 and A.1 Proof of Part (i)

A.2 Behaviour of ∆

A.3 Proof Part (iii)

B Proofs from Section 4 and B.1 Individual Product Demand (4.2)

B.2 Flexible Price Equilibrium and ZINSS (4.4)

B.3 Price Dispersion (4.5)

B.4 Cost Minimization (4.6) and (10.4)

B.5 Consolidation (4.8)

C Proofs from Section 5, and C.1 Puzzles, Policy and Persistence

C.2 Extending No Persistence

D Stochastic Equilibrium and D.1 Non-Stochastic Equilibrium

D.2 Profits and Long-Run Growth

E Slopes and Eigenvalues and E.1 Slope Coefficients

E.2 Linearized DSGE Solution

E.3 Eigenvalue Conditions

E.4 Rouche’s Theorem Conditions

F Abstract Algebra and F.1 Homology Groups

F.2 Basic Categories

F.3 De Rham Cohomology

F.4 Marginal Costs and Inflation

G Further Keynesian Models and G.1 Taylor Pricing

G.2 Calvo Wage Phillips Curve

G.3 Unconventional Policy Settings

H Empirical Robustness and H.1 Parameter Selection

H.2 Phillips Curve

I Additional Evidence and I.1 Other Structural Parameters

I.2 Lucas Critique

I.3 Trend Inflation Volatility

B Proofs from Section 4

This part contains three proofs from the framework section. The first from Subsection 2 completes a standard derivation of product demand under monopolistic competition, associated with Armington [1969] and Dixit and Stiglitz [1977].

B.1 Individual Product Demand (4.2)

image


The consumption objective (utility from consumption) is


image


where θ > 1 is required for a well-behaved problem. The household’s problem is to maximize consumption utility subject to an expenditure constraint


image


For any two varieties i and i ′ this yields relative demand.


image


Now a little manipulation and then integration with respect to i ′ yields


image


Guessing and verifying yields the demand system price level pair


image


This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.


L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

Keynesian Technology HackerNoon profile picture
Keynesian Technology@keynesian
We research, report, & publish about the impact of Keynesian Economics on the technology industry & digital products.

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
Also published here
Hackernoon
X
Threads
Bsky
X REMOVE AD