The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 18 of 18. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff seeks the following relief: (i) Either statutory damages or the total of Plaintiff’s damages and Defendants’ profits, to be elected by Plaintiff; (ii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of the Registered Works from their training sets and any other repositories; (iii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of Plaintiff’s copyrighted works from which author, title, copyright, or terms of use information was removed from their training sets and any other repositories; (iv) Attorney fees and costs. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Stephen Stich Match Jonathan Loevy* Michael Kanovitz* Lauren Carbajal* Stephen Stich Match (No. 5567854) Matthew Topic* Thomas Kayes* Steven Art* LOEVY & LOEVY 311 North Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Chicago, IL 60607 312-243-5900 (p) 312-243-5902 (f) jon@loevy.com mike@loevy.com carbajal@loevy.com match@loevy.com matt@loevy.com *pro hac vice forthcoming June 27, 2024 About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 18 of 18. The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 18 of 18. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff seeks the following relief: (i) Either statutory damages or the total of Plaintiff’s damages and Defendants’ profits, to be elected by Plaintiff; (ii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of the Registered Works from their training sets and any other repositories; (iii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of Plaintiff’s copyrighted works from which author, title, copyright, or terms of use information was removed from their training sets and any other repositories; (iv) Attorney fees and costs. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Stephen Stich Match /s/ Stephen Stich Match Jonathan Loevy* Michael Kanovitz* Lauren Carbajal* Stephen Stich Match (No. 5567854) Matthew Topic* Thomas Kayes* Steven Art* LOEVY & LOEVY 311 North Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Chicago, IL 60607 312-243-5900 (p) 312-243-5902 (f) jon@loevy.com mike@loevy.com carbajal@loevy.com match@loevy.com matt@loevy.com *pro hac vice forthcoming June 27, 2024 About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. motherjones.com

The Alleged Manifesto of Luigi Magione,  the Accused Murderer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson

Microsoft Accused of Sharing Copyrighted Works Without Attribution

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

CIR Seeks Statutory Damages, Injunctions, and Attorney Fees from OpenAI

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

How to Copyright Your AI Creations

Center for Investigative Reporting Sues OpenAI in New York Federal Court

The Center for Investigative Reporting Claims OpenAI Exploited Its Work Without Permission

Is ChatGPT a Liar? Oldest Non-profit Newsroom Files Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against OpenAI

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

How to Copyright Your AI Creations

Center for Investigative Reporting Sues OpenAI in New York Federal Court

The Center for Investigative Reporting Claims OpenAI Exploited Its Work Without Permission

Is ChatGPT a Liar? Oldest Non-profit Newsroom Files Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against OpenAI

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps