FTC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on March 27, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is the table of links with all parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Case Number: 1:23-cv-01887 Plaintiff: FTC Defendant: Binance Judge: Manish Suresh Shah Filing Date: March 27, 2023 Location: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AND CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES UNDER THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT AND COMMISSION REGULATIONS I. SUMMARY II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE III. PARTIES A. The CFTC B. Defendants C. Other Relevant Entities IV. RELEVANT STATUTORY BACKGROUND AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK A. Applicable Provisions Under the Commodity Exchange Act and Regulations B. Provisions Authorizing Imposition of Derivative Liability Under the CEA C. Anti-Evasion Principles in the CEA and Regulations V. FACTS A. Overview of the Binance Platform and Operations B. Relevant Financial Products Offered by Binance C. Binance’s Proprietary Trading Activity on Binance D. Binance’s Presence in the United States E. Zhao Controls Binance and Operates Binance as a Common Enterprise F. Binance’s Superficial Efforts to Limit Trading by United States Customers and Internal Recognition That Its Compliance Program Was Just “For Show” G. Binance Was Aware of United States Regulatory Requirements but Ignored Them H. Binance Has Guided United States Customers to Evade Its Compliance Controls Through the Use of VPNs and Other Creative Means I. Binance Has Directed Its VIP Customers to Evade Compliance Controls, Including Through Submission of “New” KYC Documents J. Binance Knowingly Concealed the Presence of United States Customers In Internal Documents and Data K. Binance Has Relied On “Brokers” to Introduce Customers to the Binance Platform Without Effective Access Controls L. Examples of Market Participants Currently Trading on Binance and Binance’s Efforts to Help Them Evade Its Compliance Controls Trading Firm A Trading Firm B Trading Firm C VI. VIOLATIONS OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT AND REGULATIONS COUNT I COUNT II COUNT III COUNT IV COUNT V COUNT VI COUNT VII VII. RELIEF REQUESTED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01887 retrieved on September 4, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. docdroid.net

Summary of the FTC v Binance Court Case

All of the Counts SBF Believes Should Be Dismissed in His Trial

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

FTC v. Binance: Everything You Need to Know

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

101 Stories To Learn About Binance

5 Crypto Exchanges Reviewed (Plus a Winner!)

7 Reasons Why Crypto Project Founders Should Jump Aboard the IEO Ship Before it’s Too Late!

A path towards crypto’s inevitable centralization.

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

101 Stories To Learn About Binance

5 Crypto Exchanges Reviewed (Plus a Winner!)

7 Reasons Why Crypto Project Founders Should Jump Aboard the IEO Ship Before it’s Too Late!

A path towards crypto’s inevitable centralization.

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps