Michigan Takes Amazon to Court for Violation of Its Antitrust Reform Act

COUNT X: VIOLATIONS OF MICHIGAN STATE LAW

490. Plaintiff State of Michigan repeats and re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every paragraph and allegation of the Complaint as if fully set forth herein.

491. The acts alleged in the Complaint violate the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.771, et seq.

492. The acts alleged in the Complaint constitute the establishment, maintenance, or use of a monopoly, or an attempt to establish a monopoly, of trade or commerce in a relevant market by Amazon, for the purpose of excluding or limiting competition or controlling, fixing, or maintaining prices, pursuant to Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.773.

493. Michigan seeks equitable and injunctive relief as authorized by Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.777, including, without limitation, the following:

(a) Injunctive or other equitable relief;

(b) Costs and fees incurred by Michigan in this suit; and

(c) Other remedies as the Court finds necessary to redress and prevent recurrence of each of Amazon’s violations.